The fact that we have close to 20 people interested in dinner on Monday
brought up an interesting question for me. As a one of the few
practitioners (as opposed to corporate research or academia) on the CHI
conference committee for two different years now, one of the things that
is always a struggle is the balancing of needs across several groups.
There have long been complaints that CHI is "too academic" etc. So, my
question is, what things, to you as an interaction designer, does CHI do
well or not well? Why do you come to the conference or why do you avoid
I got the following as part of the AIGA Communique ...
DUX (Designing for User Experience), November 35
In collaboration with the ACM¹s SIGCHI and SIGGRAPH, the AIGA Experience
Design community will offer a conference in San Francisco on Designing for
User Experience in which design practitioners from multiple disciplines and
domain share case studies of their work which help illuminate the question,
What is good experience design and what factors contribute to the creation
of a success or failure?
I know a few people were waiting for some sort of official announcement