Recent Discussions

3 Mar 2004 - 5:41pm
0
10 years ago
12 replies
Dave Malouf
2005

Creating a proposal for field research

Hey there,

I've been tasked with the job of writing a proposal to my supes to convince
the powers that be that field research will give real results and show true
value to all involved stake holders. I'd love to gain some insights from
others who had to do the selling of this great idea to people who just don't
get it at all.

Background: I work for a very business driven company.

3 Mar 2004 - 5:16am
0
10 years ago
11 replies
Terms:
Narey, Kevin
2004

Label left or right align

Basic stuff I know but...

Putting political persuasion aside, does anyone have an opinion on aligning
form field labels left or right to the form field.

I generally prefer to right align so that they remain in close proximity to
the device they are describing. Left aligning (which does have it's pro's in
defining a bounding area) can cause issues with marrying the label to the
device unless using a background colour to suggest the relationship.

Kind regards

KN

**********************************************************************
gedas united kingdom limited
Registered in England no.

2 Mar 2004 - 6:05pm
0
Josh Seiden
2003

Freelance job: usability test moderator, NY/NJ

36 Partners has an immediate opening for an experienced
usability tester.

Our client, located in northern NJ, is developing a web
site for a major consumer brand. We are conducting
usability tests on wireframes, paper prototypes, and
(perhaps) some creative comps.

We're looking for an experienced usability tester who
can prepare, execute, and report on a planned single
day of usability tests.

If you have immediate availability to take on this
relatively short project (2-3 weeks), please respond
with

1. Your resume (text only, in the body of the email.)
2.

1 Mar 2004 - 3:58pm
0
10 years ago
3 replies
Michael Bayquen
2004

Bad or Good Interaction?

Hi Everyone, I am interested in knowing other people's
opinion on a design study at this URL:
http://www.wwauctions.com/bq/g4/study.html

I know a little about why the design is bad
Usability-wise, but am very interested to hear about
your comments, Interaction design-wise.

Thank you for your time.

BTW: The 3 images are 3 different screens.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools

28 Feb 2004 - 1:55am
0
10 years ago
2 replies
Jeff Howard
2004

RE: More on re-ordering rows

Hi all,

Worked through an interaction that moves toward WYSIWYG, but stops short
of drag and drop. It's more of a click-and-drop. Let me know what you think.

Here's an overview:
1. User selects a row to move. The row highlights in the table.
2. User clicks elsewhere in the table to indicate the destination.
3.

27 Feb 2004 - 6:55pm
0
10 years ago
4 replies
Seth Nickell
2004

Getting access to users ensconsed within large companies

As part of the product I am designing now its important that I better
understand (talk to, shadow, function as...) a few different classes of
users as they exist in their "natural habitat": the large non-hi-tech
corporation.

In my past experience I've always been able to use direct access to
prospective customers or lean on my personal connections to find
suitable people to talk to. Unfortunately because this product area is
very new for Red Hat, we don't have suitable business relationships that
I can leverage to get at "prospective users".

26 Feb 2004 - 8:13pm
0
Josh Seiden
2003

When a widget is just not right ( was RE: [ID Discuss]Re-orderingrows in a table.)

Another spin on this great subject line:

When an answer is just not right, re-think the
question.

In other words...

When faced with a choice between two undesirable
solutions, it often pays to go back to the problem
definition. Sometimes by redefining the question, you
can open up a new solution space that includes
something desirable.

Some questions I would ask: why does a user want to
re-order things on this page? Are all re-ordering
options equally valid? Is complete flexibility needed?
Is it even desirable? Maybe template-based layouts work
better.

26 Feb 2004 - 6:00pm
0
Nick Ragouzis
2004

When a widget is just not right ( was RE: [ID Discuss] Re-orderingrows in a table.)

I agree Dave. And besides ... the checkbox idiom is exactly what's desired here.

Sandeep wrote, relevant to the option using shifting:
> Basically, user selects one row by checking the checkbox,
> and then, uses the up/down buttons to dynamically move
> the selected row.

Why in the world must the user be limited to selecting one row (i.e., in a radio button group) for the shift operation? And
would the rows thus selected have to be contiguous at the outset?

26 Feb 2004 - 5:21pm
0
Terms:
Dave Malouf
2005

When a widget is just not right ( was RE: Re-ordering rows in a table.)

Hey there,

Andrei said, why would you ever use a checkbox for a radio button? Sandeep
said he was doing it for the wrong reasons.

I recently designed an app where I did just that.

Why?

Well, I made the decision w/ my peers b/c while the behavior is wrong, we
discovered:
1. this behavior is actually not well understood by our end-users
2. that radio buttons all stacked up in a vertical row just looks really
weird. It creates a warping effect in attempting to read the labels next
them and the clarity gets a lost.

26 Feb 2004 - 4:52pm
0
10 years ago
6 replies
sandeepblues
2003

More on re-ordering rows

Unfortunately, where I work, the role of ID and UI
engineer are forced into 1 person: me. Therefore, I
don't have the luxury, authority, or maybe, the
self-discipline to suggest the hard-to-implement
drag-n-drop DHTML design.

I am leaning towards option (b) : The user changes the
order number in a textbox to change the row order, as
opposed to (a): provide up/down buttons and a
selection list.

Here is my reasoning. Please comment.

There are numerous edit pages for this my.yahoo-style
front-end application, that require reordering of
items in a table.

Syndicate content Get the feed